Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial Project
 
Home | Who we are | Research | Publications | Links | Site map | Contact us

Soil Health and Biodiversity

Topics:
Soil health

The WICST team interviewed 28 Wisconsin farmers in Walworth and Columbia Counties and conducted a number of chemical, physical and biological tests on the soils in the cropping systems trial.  The goal was to evaluate the changes in soil characteristics under the different systems between 1990 and 1997.

The major differences that emerged are as follows:

  • Soil test levels of phosphorus and potassium have been dropping in the low input CS3 system compared to the high input CS1 system.  However, after 10 years soil test levels are still in the normal to very high range
  • Soil pH was slightly lower — soil was more acidic — under continuous corn than the other systems. Dropping pH may result in irreversible changes in the nutrient holding capacity (cation exchange capacity) of the soil.
  • The pasture showed better soil aggregation than the other systems.
  • Earthworm numbers and types of earthworms present in the soil varied by system.
  • The most biologically complex cropping systems (CS3 and CS6) showed an increase in microbial biomass over time, while the least diverse system (CS1) showed a reduction.
  • Total soil organic matter increased in the pasture plots (CS6) at both sites over the course of the study, so that it was significantly higher than in the other systems by 1997. 
  • The mean soil organic matter in the forage systems was 12% higher than the mean for the cash crop systems by 1998.
  • The areas of highest surface compaction occurred in CS3 due to intensive mechanical weed control.

Overall Conclusion: Few significant differences in soil quality/health emerged under the different cropping systems during these first years of the Trial.  It must be pointed out that the time frame of the study is very short compared to the 150-year agricultural history of these soils.  Furthermore, the soils on which the WICST trial is conducted are among the finest in the world, buffering changes in management and supporting a wide range of cropping systems. 

Earthworms

The four species of earthworms found on the WICST plots can be broadly classified into two different groups based on where they live in the soil. Three species are topsoil-dwelling earthworms (technically called endogeics) that create horizontal burrows in the top 25 cm of the soil, and one species is a subsoil-dwelling earthworm (the nightcrawler or anecic) that creates one or two burrows that can extend 3 meters into the soil profile. The primary factors affecting earthworm populations appear to be tillage and manure application but the two groups respond differently.

Topsoil-dwelling earthworms: These earthworms did not appear to be directly affected by tillage intensity because their abundance did not fluctuate during the different phases of the same rotation regardless of the amount of tillage. However, the use of manure did result in more topsoil-dwellers. The manure-receiving, forage-based systems had twice the number as the cash-grain systems. Abundance ranged from 31 to 460 earthworms/m2.

Subsoil-dwelling earthworms: Populations of these earthworms correspond directly to the amount of tillage in the system. Of the six systems, the no-till corn-soybean system had the highest number and continuous corn the lowest. Abundance ranged from 0 to 43 earthworms/m2.


Soil biodiversity

Extensive research has been conducted on the WICST plots to characterize the communities of soil-dwelling organisms under the different cropping systems.  Because little similar work has been done elsewhere, efforts have focused on how to characterize the abundance, diversity and overall “community profile” of soil organisms, including microbes, nematodes, arthropods (insects and spiders) and earthworms. 

Our research shows that after 6-8 years in the different cropping systems, the communities of soil organisms do diverge from each other, although the implications of this for the health and long-term productivity of the systems are not necessarily clear.  In every group of organisms examined the cropping systems differed from each other over time, sometimes in terms of abundance, sometimes in terms of diversity, and sometimes in terms of the specific species present.  (Note that we used molecular techniques so that unculturable microorganisms could be included in our sampling.) To date, the project has identified 20 species of springtails (Collembolas) new to Wisconsin (bringing the total to 52 for the state), and one species “new to science,” underscoring how much remains to be discovered in groups that are even less visible. 

Soil erosion

The WICST project has not directly measured soil erosion on plots, largely because our plots are located on land with little erosion potential.  However, we note that our work with cover crops (LINK) is of significant interest to those concerned about erosion that might occur after the harvest of small grains and short season crops.  The recently Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation reflects the benefits of cover crops.  This has offered producers a new incentive to consider systems that include a small grain and cover crop (like CS3), and has given us renewed motivation to find ways to adapt cover crop use to a variety of commercial farm settings.

 

 

Home | Who we are | Research | Publications | Links | Site map | Contact us

University of Wisconsin-Madison
College of Agricultural and Life Sciences
If you have any difficulty accessing this page, please contact our web master.

Site hosted by the UW-Madison Center for Integrated Agricultural Systems